How capacity providers oversee delegated books in 2026: the tooling landscape
Every capacity provider now hears the same demand from three sides: prove what happened on your delegated book. Our compliance calendar sets out who is asking and when, and this page maps the tools that answer, lane by lane and vendor by vendor, with room for the real alternatives in each one. One note on method before the map. Every claim here about another vendor comes from that vendor's own pages, and each one carries a link. Braven publishes this page and appears in it. Judge the map by its links.
Updated August 2026
The three lanes
Bordereaux and delegated data platforms standardize the files coverholders send. They sit in the data pipeline. Their unit of work is the file.
Underwriting workbenches with delegated modules run the binder lifecycle inside the platform underwriters already use. Their unit of work is the programme.
AI audit and operations layers read the documents behind the data and check each decision against the authority you granted. They sit on top of the other two. Their unit of work is the decision.
Lane one: bordereaux and delegated data platforms
The oldest lane makes reported data consistent. VIPR has built bordereaux data management for the London market since 2009. Its INTRALI platform validates, transforms and aggregates risk, premium and claims data into a single trusted model, with hundreds of checks run against the binder terms. VIPR offered INTRALI as the way across when the Delegated Data Manager ceased to be a core market service, saying in late 2023 that it served over 45 percent of Lloyd's managing agents. Watertrace tracks a facility from pre-inception to bind. It processes bordereaux into a standard format and gives audit teams a base for monitoring coverholders and TPAs. Bordereau.ai automates how bordereaux get ingested, validated, corrected and reconciled against a data contract the carrier defines once. It exports to Lloyd's 5.2 and custom formats, with an audit trail behind it. The DDM itself survives as an elective service through LIMOSS, powered by Charles Taylor InsureTech's Tide, for firms that still want the central pipe by choice. SwiftCase and BBNET run related systems for managing delegated authority, covering binder records, oversight workflow and what the carrier can see. Different products, one shared job: the files arrive clean, on time and in one shape, so the people who read them can trust what they say and act on it the day it lands.
Lane two: underwriting workbenches with delegated modules
Send folds delegated business into its underwriting workbench. Coverholder onboarding, binding authority records and due diligence checks sit inside the same system underwriters already use. Bordereaux arrive in many formats and get checked against agreement terms and authority rules as they land. Premium, exposure and claims get tracked across MGAs in near real time. The unit of work widens from the file to the programme, and the appeal is one system instead of several, one place to look when a binder question comes up and one place to fix it when the answer looks wrong.
Lane three: AI audit and operations layers
The newest lane audits decisions rather than files. FurtherAI ships agentic AI across the underwriting lifecycle. Its scope covers submission intake, guideline validation, policy review and bordereaux generation. It reports a reinsurer customer that cut per audit workload by 45 percent, from roughly 200 hours to 110, across a panel of more than 100 MGAs.
Braven works in the same lane with a different center of gravity. Braven is the AI operations platform for MGAs and reinsurers that do their own underwriting. For capacity providers it operates as the audit layer on the delegated book. Binding authority adherence gets scored on every bound risk. A decision trail follows every underwriter. Every extracted field links to its source page, and the whole book stays visible live rather than ninety days late. It coexists with the lane one systems rather than replacing them. It reads the documents behind the data, operates in English, Spanish and Portuguese, and carries a 90 day full money back guarantee that no customer has claimed. Seventeen or more firms across seven countries run it in production. The rest of that story lives on Braven for capacity providers.
How to choose
Three questions sort this market faster than any feature list. Do your files arrive messy, late or unreconciled? Start in lane one. Does your team lack one system of work for the binder lifecycle? Look at lane two. Can you already collect clean data, yet still not prove, risk by risk, that the decisions stayed inside the authority you granted, to the person you granted it to, on the day the risk was bound? That is lane three's job, and it is the question the FCA, Lloyd's and the LMA now ask. The lanes also combine. Many firms pair a data platform for the files with an audit layer for the decisions, and that pairing covers both halves of the demand, the clean data the market wants to see and the proof of judgment the regulators have started to ask for. Choose the lane first. The vendor comes second.
Sources
- VIPR, INTRALI product page
- VIPR on the DDM exit, December 2023
- Watertrace, Delegated Authority
- Bordereau.ai
- LIMOSS, DDM elective service
- SwiftCase, delegated authority management
- BBNET, delegated authority
- Send, delegated underwriting
- FurtherAI, best agentic AI platform for MGAs
- FurtherAI, software for bordereaux management
- Braven for capacity providers
